Skip to main content
DEMONSTRATION WEBSITE — Demo, Stration & Sample is a fictional law firm created to demonstrate professional legal website design. No legal services are offered through this website.
Empty Missouri courtroom interior with wooden judge bench and American flag

Lawsuits & Litigation · Trial

Personal Injury Trials in Missouri

Only a small percentage of personal injury cases reach trial, but the possibility of trial shapes every negotiation. This page explains how trials work — the process, the jury's role, the burden of proof, and possible outcomes.

The short answer

What happens at a personal injury trial?

Direct answer: At trial, each side presents evidence — witness testimony, documents, and expert opinions — to a judge or jury. The plaintiff presents first, then the defense. The fact-finder (jury, or judge in a bench trial) decides whether the defendant is responsible and what to award. The plaintiff generally must prove the case by a preponderance of the evidence — more likely than not. In Missouri, fault percentages may reduce any award.

The trial process

How a trial unfolds.

  • Jury selection: Potential jurors are questioned and chosen to serve on the jury.
  • Opening statements: Each side outlines what it expects the evidence to show.
  • Plaintiff’s case: The plaintiff presents witnesses, documents, and experts, with cross-examination by the defense.
  • Defense case: The defense presents its own witnesses and evidence, with cross-examination.
  • Closing arguments: Each side summarizes its position and asks the fact-finder to decide in its favor.
  • Jury instructions: The judge explains the law the jury must apply.
  • Deliberation and verdict: The jury considers the evidence and returns a verdict.

Burden of proof

More likely than not.

In a personal injury trial, the plaintiff carries the burden of proof. The standard is generally a preponderance of the evidence — meaning the plaintiff must show it is more likely than not that the defendant’s conduct caused the harm. This is a lower standard than the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard of criminal cases.

Practically, the plaintiff must convince the fact-finder that their version of events is more convincing than the defense’s. The evidence does not need to be overwhelming; it needs to tip the scales. Understanding this standard helps explain why trials turn on the relative weight of evidence rather than certainty.

Possible outcomes

What a trial can produce.

A trial can end in a verdict for the defendant — meaning no recovery — or a verdict for the plaintiff, with damages awarded. In Missouri, the jury may also assign fault percentages under the comparative fault framework, reducing the award by the plaintiff’s share.

After a verdict, either side may file post-trial motions or appeal. A verdict in the plaintiff’s favor establishes the right to recover, though collection and any appeals can take additional time. Most cases never reach this stage — but for those that do, the trial is where the evidence is finally weighed and decided.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions, answered directly.

General information only, not legal advice for any particular situation.

Free case review

Trial questions? Request a free case review.

This is the intake experience a Kansas City injury firm would offer: clear fields, plain language and no pressure. On this demonstration site the form is entirely inert — nothing you type leaves your browser.

Demonstration only. No information is transmitted to an attorney or law firm.

Office
1100 Main St, Kansas City, MO 64105

Demonstration Case Review

Demonstration form only. Information entered here is not transmitted to a law firm or attorney.

Medical Treatment

No attorney-client relationship is created by submitting this demonstration form, and no information is sent to a lawyer.